I want to take on the concept Liberalism and Leftism as -isms at all. In reality they can be conceived of as nothing more than forces of entropy. That is to say they are the barbaric darkness cloaked in false notions of justice and rationality. But this is far from the truth, and we can see it right in front of our very eyes. But they have been kayfabe’d into a narrative scope in contrast with us. The conscious versus the unconscious, being versus unbeing. But are we wise enough to take on the fight? Are we strong enough to win? Do we have the spirit, the will, the courage to do what is necessary in spite of their darkness?
Directionality and unity must be maintained. This is easy to accomplish through understanding one’s place within the current regime. One must also compare this place with the past, in order to understand the greater overall reference to one’s own position within the current framework in time. This is necessary in order to keep up the pressure in the system from our end, and in doing so we can direct, force, and cajole our ideals into the apparatus, systems, and people, over time converting them into our way of thinking. This won’t be easy but there is a pathway, and so we should consider the proceeding paragraphs carefully.
NETTR/NEOTR: No Enemies To/On The Right. NEVER attack people on the right. Remain neutral if you MUST (if it is explicitly politically expedient), but never attack. The true enemy should not be characterized as “the Left” or “Liberals”, but the concept of “entropy” itself. That’s also the truth. We have no qualms with what amounts to an emotional reaction and response to the suffering of being which we call “utopianism” which emerges into the public political sphere as those political movements prior mentioned.
These so-called “ideologies” are no more than the yelps of an injured animal. We must understand this, as fellow humans, as we too are equally injured. But we are also conscious enough to know that utopian thinking will get us nowhere good. Utopian thinking will only result in even greater pain and suffering. It is not that the left seeks to ultimately eliminate suffering, for that is by definition impossible, but that they aim to blind us to it. This is no solution, it is dissolution. It is an acid which dissolves all into grey goo, upon which we must suffocate. That will get us nowhere. You know it, I know it, even they know it. We all know this instinctually, and it is only through subversion of these instincts that we allow the suffering to envelop us, and force us into the “Edenic Unconscious” where we will suffer unending hardship, for we would too be unendingly blind to it. If you are unfamiliar with the term, it is an analogy drawn from the biblical concept, before man was conscious of his suffering in the world, before he was cast from the Garden of Eden, branded with the knowledge of good and evil. For it is not that we can eliminate suffering, but only our consciousness towards it. What is the result of such? Do we really eliminate suffering by blinding ourselves to it? Or do we merely make it unending because now we cannot mitigate it whatsoever? Such is the result of utopianism. The only solution is to engage with the world bravely, accept that suffering is not something we can eliminate, but only mitigate. Of this, mankind is capable.
Since the “enemies” on the left or liberal sides of things are utopians, they are not legitimate political actors. They are children. Sure, they have legitimate grievances, as do all living in the world, but we do not let children run the world. They are far too immature and unable to regulate their intakes and they are unable to calculate reasonable decisions, not only for themselves, but especially for others and the wider society. They are ultimately selfish and uncaring for others except in very limited circumstances. They are emotional, destructive and short tempered. In short, they are not political actors at all. They are entropy in human form. This also means they are an inevitable force to reckon with. Yet, we must ensure that the adults are in charge of society.
Unfortunately, what we have done over the past few centuries is allow the children to be in charge now and then, and so much so, they have erected a ratchet structure which continuously offers them more and more powers over time. This has infected every aspect of society, leading to many areas of decline. I am not saying that improvements to human life have not happened, that development of medicine, technology, and essential resources have not occurred, but that all of this has occurred despite the entropic forces of liberalism (and its dysgenic offshoot leftism), not because of it.
Thus the essential political struggle is not left and right, it is not capitalism versus socialism, nor anarchism versus authoritarianism. It is entropy versus order. It is chaos versus order. It is civilization versus barbarism. It is light versus darkness. It is good versus evil. It is a battle of life and death. Sure, it may be a slow, agonizing, entropic decline ending in bestial unconsciousness, but that is death, death of the mind, and death of the body nevertheless. Is not life itself worth fighting for?
We can therefore characterize the ratchet in many aspects, from the constraints on speech and expression for the stated goals of preventing “harm”, as so utopian it ends up feasting on its own tail like the archetypal Ouroboros. Or perhaps the welfare state, which is a society which feasts on its own body like the mythical Annunaki feasted upon their progenitor Abzu. Or perhaps the much celebrated sin of Pride which comes before the fall, a mass demonstration and exhibition of excess and self-indulgence, delving ever deeper into the once-private perversions and persuasions year after year, and to what end? First it was simply a day, then a weekend, then a week, a month, a season? Soon it will every day be pride year, being such a focus on something so material, so spiritually void, that nothing else will remain except the void itself. Oblivion.
The development of our civilization was not without reason; it was not done in ignorance nor was it done in malice. Constitutional law is just that, that which constitutes us. Should we fall into oblivion, so does our law, so does what constitutes us. There is far more to living than comfort. Man sups on more than bread alone. Therefore we must re-implement not merely the word of law, but the spirit of the law, the spirit of what makes our civilization civilized. We must therefore understand a few things:
Politics is downstream of Culture;
Culture is downstream of Law;
Law is downstream of Power;
Power is downstream of Wisdom;
Wisdom is downstream of Experience;
Experience is downstream of Action;
Action is downstream of Thought;
Thought is downstream of Instinct;
Instinct is downstream of Suffering
Suffering is downstream of Being;
Being is downstream of Creation;
Creation is downstream of The Creator.
Thus in the twelve-step program of politics, we are well-supported, and nearly there. Working backwards from those twelve steps, we know that we are created, thus we are, thus we suffer, thus we develop instinct, thus we think, thus we act, thus we experience, thus we grow wiser. With this wisdom we must aim for Power. With power we can change laws, thus changing culture, and politics. Then will, civilization, should we remain vigilant, be saved.
But how? We must seize control of the narrative, and if not that immediately, we must frustrate the narrative of the entropic forces at every opportunity. We should not treat these people as conscious actors, but instead they should be seen as forces of evil, hellbent on killing, rape, murder, should they gain power. We shouldn’t even frame their power as power, but our own failure to prevent entropy from taking hold. Should it happen we should never look to the outside as the cause, but inwards. Entropy is not an action, it is a reaction to being’s suffering.
Furthermore, we should not be using the entropic framing in regards to the question of rights or who has or doesn’t have a right. Everyone has every single right. The question then becomes whether those rights have been respected or not, or where one’s rights might interfere with those of another or not. Most importantly, rights must be seen as a collective responsibility, wherein rights that are violated are a moral condemnation on the whole society, the whole civilization, the existence of that civilization itself. For without the capacity to uphold such rights, the entire paradigm of the State’s existence as a civilizational vanguard is put to question. This weakens order and strengthens entropy. The State and civilization has the moral duty and responsibility to uphold that which glues the structure of society together. The violation of fundamental rights must bestow a penalty on that society, as penance towards the respect it should show to civilization itself, to reignite the fire dimmed by impropriety. An injustice to anyone, is a victory for entropy, and a bleeding wound for civilization waiting for infection and death. That damage must be made whole.
Furthermore with the ordering of The Creator to Politics, we have a moral origin and system which too helps reduce entropy. There is a basis for such a moral system and if it is violated it is a spiritual abomination.
If you are interested in my recently published book, find it at the link here: Essays on the Western Decline: The only way out, is through. https://a.co/d/043rbFxg